Shopping on line can be easy, simple and save you lots of money. It can also take a lot of your time, frustrate you, and result in unwanted purchases. Now the same can be said for regular high street shopping, but with the vast opportunity presented by the Internet it will pay you to spend a few minutes reading this and understanding how to better optimize your Malmedy Massacre shopping experience:

1. Compare - without doubt the biggest advantage that the Malmedy Massacre offers shoppers today is the ability to compare thousands of Malmedy Massacre at a time. This is a great thing, but not necessarily all the time! Too much can be daunting at times so take advantage of the great comparison sites and where possible let them do the hard work for you.

2. Research - if it has been said it will be on the internet. Ignorance is no longer a justifiable reason for buying the wrong thing. Take the time to research in detail everything that you could possible want to know about

3. Testimonials - don't know anybody that has bought a Malmedy Massacre? Wrong! If the Malmedy Massacre is good the internet will let you know. Use the Internet as a friend and get testimonials before you buy.

4. Questions - Got a question about Malmedy Massacre then search the Forums, FAQ's, Blogs etc. Don't be afraid to ask .....

5. Reputation - Never heard of the company selling Malmedy Massacre? Don't worry, no reason why you should know every company in the world, but you know someone that does! Use the internet to find out what people are saying about Malmedy Massacre and build up a picture of their reputation for sales, returns, customer service, delivery etc.

6. Returns - still worried that even after all of the above your Malmedy Massacre wont be what you want? Check out the returns policy. There is so much competition now that someone, somewhere is bound to offer the terms that you are comfortable with.

7. Feedback - happy with your Malmedy Massacre then let people know, after all you are depending on others people input in your buying decision, so why not give a little back.

8. Security - check for the yellow padlock on the Malmedy Massacre site before you buy, and the s after http:/ /i.e. https:// = a secure site

9. Contact - got a question about Malmedy Massacre, or want to leave a comment then check out the sites contact page. Reputable companies have them and respond.

10. Payment - ready to pay for your Malmedy Massacre, then use your credit card or PayPal! Be aware of companies that don't accept them, there may be genuine reasons but given the huge amount of choice you have when buying online there is no reason at all not to buy via credit card or PayPal.

The Malmedy massacre refers to a war crime in which unarmed United States POW were executed by their German people captors. The massacre was committed on December 17, 1944 by Kampfgruppe Joachim Peiper (part of the 1st SS Division Leibstandarte SS Adolf Hitler), a Nazi Germany combat unit, during the Battle of the Bulge.

This massacre, as well as others committed by the same unit the same day and on the following days, was the subject of a trial during the Dachau Trials of 1946.

Context Within the framework of plans developed by Hitler for what would become known as the Battle of the Bulge, the principal objective of breaking through Allied lines had been given to the 6th SS Panzer Army under the command of General Sepp Dietrich. He was supposed to break the Allied front between Monschau and Losheimergraben, cross the Meuse River and subsequently capture Antwerp.United States Army in World War II, The European Theater of Operations, The Ardennes: Battle of, by Hugh M. Cole - Office of the Chief of Military History, Department of the Army, Washington, D.C., 1965 pp. 75 – Charles MacDonald (1984). A Time For Trumpets: The Untold Story of the Battle of the Bulge. Bantam Books. ISBN 0-553-34226-6. Kampfgruppe Peiper composed of armoured and motorized elements, was the spearhead of the left wing of the 6th SS Panzer Army. Once the infantry had breached the American lines, Peiper’s role consisted of advancing via Ligneuville, Stavelot, Trois-Ponts and Werbomont and seize and secure the Meuse bridges around Huy. United States Army in World War II, The European Theater of Operations, The Ardennes: Battle of, by Hugh M. Cole - Office of the Chief of Military History, Department of the Army, Washington, D.C., 1965 pp. 260 and fol. – Ardennes 1944-1945, Guide du champ de bataille, Émile Engels, histoire, Ed. Racine, Bruxelles, 1994

The best roads were reserved for the bulk of the 1st SS Panzer Division Leibstandarte SS Adolf Hitler. It was intended that Peiper use secondary roads, but they proved to be unsuitable for heavy armoured vehicles such as the Tiger II tanks attached to the Kampfgruppe.

The success of the whole operation was highly dependent on the swift capture of the bridges over the river Meuse. This required a rapid advance through US positions, circumventing any points of resistance whenever possible. Another factor that Peiper had to consider was the shortage of gasoline: the fuel resources of the Reich had been greatly reduced since the Romania during World War II#The royal coup.

Finally within this context one should not lose sight of the fact that specific orders would have been given by Hitler that the battle needed to be carried out with brutality in order to scare the enemy. Sepp Dietrich confirmed the fact during the trial relative to this case.Malmedy Massacre, Richard Gallagher, Paperback Library, 1964, p. 110-111 According to certain sources, during the briefings preceding the operation, Peiper would have clearly stated that no quarter should be granted, not to take prisoners and to show no pity towards the Belgian civilians.

Break out and first massacres Right from the start, German operations on the northern front did not go smoothly because of obstinate resistance by American troops. Peiper had hoped to be able to exploit an opening as early as the morning of December 16 - the first day of the offensive. In reality, he had to wait in massive traffic jams behind the front while the German infantry, which was supposed to open a breach in the US lines, waited for him to arrive. It was only around daybreak on December 17, after moving his Kampfgruppe into the frontline that he succeeded in breaking out in the direction of Honsfeld, Massacre At Malmédy During the Battle of the Bulge, by Michael Reynolds – World War II Magazine, Février 2003 – where elements of his force would cold-bloodedly kill several dozen American POWs. Review and recommandation of the deputy judge advocate for war crimes, 20 octobre 1947, pp. 4 à 22 -

After capturing Honsfeld, Peiper left his assigned route for several kilometers to seize a small gasoline depot in Büllingen, where another massacre of American prisoners would later be reported.

At this point, Peiper was in the enemy's rear. If he had advanced from Büllingen towards Elsenborn in the north he could have trapped two US divisions (i.e. the 2nd Infantry Division (United States) and the 99th Infantry Division (United States)s). However, Peiper decided to head back to his assigned route and capture Ligneuville, passing by Mödersheid, Schoppen, Ondenval and Thirimont.United States Army in World War II, The European Theater of Operations, The Ardennes: Battle of, by Hugh M. Cole - Office of the Chief of Militiary History, Department of the Army, Washington, D.C., 1965 p. 91, Statement of General Lauer "the enemy had the key to success within his hands, but did not know it." –

This move was difficult due to the nature of the terrain and the poor quality of the available roads. Eventually, at the exit of the small village of Thirimont the spearhead was unable to take the direct road in the direction of Ligneuville. As a result, he was forced to turn away from his planned route once again. Rather than turn to the left after the Thirimont exit, the spearhead veered right and advanced towards the crossroads of Baugnez which is equidistant between Malmedy, Ligneuville and Waimes.

Massacre at Baugnez Between noon and 1 p.m. the German spearhead approached the crossroads. Meanwhile, an American convoy of around thirty vehicles, primarily made up of elements of the American 285th Field Artillery Observation Battalion (FAOB), was negotiating the crossroads and turning right in the direction of Ligneuville in order to reach Sankt Vith where it was ordered to join the US 7th Armored Division, to which it was attached and which was dispatched there to reinforce the defense of the city.

The spearhead of Peiper’s group spotted the American convoy and opened fire, immobilizing the first and last vehicles of the column, forcing it to stop. With only rifles and other small arms to defend themselves, the Americans were forced to surrender.

While the German column continued on the road towards Ligneuville, the American prisoners were taken to a field, where they were joined by others captured by the SS earlier in the day. The majority of the testimonies later collected from the survivors state that approximately 120 men were gathered in the field. For reasons which still remain unclear today, the Germans suddenly opened fire on their prisoners with machine-guns. A number of Germans later claimed that some prisoners had tried to escape, others alleged that while left alone in the meadow they had somehow recovered their previously discarded weapons and fired on the German troops who continued their progress in the direction of Ligneuville.Wholesale Slaughter at Baugnez-lez-Malmedy, Willy D. Alenus, According to certain sources, this should merely be regarded as an unfortunate incident due to a sequence of circumstances having led the Germans to open fire without willful intent to shoot down their prisoners.Massacre a Malmedy? Ardennes:17 décembre 1944, Gerd J.Gust Cuppens, 1989, Editions Heimdal Of the 88 bodies recovered a month later, the majority showed gunshot wounds to the head, evidence more consistent with mass execution than with an act of self-defense or an attempt to prevent escape.

Apparently no record of an order given by an SS officer to shoot the prisoners exists. However, some survivors testified that they had heard an order given to kill all the prisoners: Macht alle kaputt! http://www.scrapbookpages.com/dachauscrapbook/DachauTrials/MalmedyMassacre02.html

As soon as the Germans opened fire, the Americans panicked. Some tried to flee, the vast majority were gunned down where they stood.

A few of the soldiers attempted shelter in a cafe located at the crossroads. Germans soldiers set fire to the building, and shot any who tried to escape from the flames. Some of those in the field had dropped to the ground and feigned death when the shooting started. However, SS troops walked among the groups of bodies. Any who were found to be alive were promptly shot through the head.

Much later, a few survivors, though wounded or shocked, emerged from their hiding places and managed to make their way back through the lines to nearby Malmedy, where American troops were defending the town. Among the soldiers who escaped was actor Charles Durning.{{cite web|url=http://www.gijobs.net/gijobs/index.cfm?event=Columns&id=462 |title=They Also Served: June 6, 1944: The Longest Day |accessdate=2007-01-08 |first=Scott |last=Baron |year=2007 |month=January |work=G.I. Jobs website |publisher=G.I. Jobs Online |quote=Taken prisoner, he was among the very few troops who escaped being massacred by Gen. Peiper’s 1st Liebstandart Adolph Hitler, an elite SS Panzer unit at Malmedy. He escaped with two others, and returned to find the remainder murdered. (spelling errors and term ''elite'' in the source)--> Eventually, 43 survivors managed to find refuge in the Allied lines, some with the help of Belgian civilians.The Malmedy Massacre Revisited - Henri Rogister, Joseph Dejardin et Emile Jamar - Website du C.R.I.B.A. (Centre de Recherches et d'Informations sur la Bataille des Ardennes) http://www.criba.be/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=64&Itemid=4 Testimony made by the survivors was collected during the hours following the massacre. All the survivors' accounts were similar and corroborated each other, even though they had had no opportunity to discuss the events and agree to a common story.

The first survivors of the massacre were picked up by a patrol from the 291st Combat Engineer Battalion around 2.30 p.m. the same day. The inspector general of the First Army (United States) learned of the shootings three or four hours later. By the late evening of the 17th, rumors that the enemy was killing prisoners had reached the forward American divisionsUNITED STATES ARMY IN WORLD WAR II, The European Theater of Operations, THE ARDENNES: BATTLE OF THE BULGE, by Hugh M. Cole - OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF MILITARY HISTORY, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, WASHINGTON, D.C., 1965 - .

As a result one US unit issued orders that, "No SS troops or paratroopers will be taken prisoner but will be shot on sight."{{cite book| last = Cole | first = Hugh M. | title = The Ardennes: Battle of the Bulge | url = http://www.army.mil/cmh-pg/books/wwii/7-8/7-8_CONT.HTM | accessdate = 2006-06-03 | year = 1965 | publisher = Office of the Chief of Military History, Department of the Army | location = Washington, D.C., USA | language = English | id = {{LCCN|65|0|60001--> | pages = 261-264 | chapter = Chapter XI. The ''1st SS Panzer Division's'' Dash Westward, and ''Operation Greif'' | chapterurl = http://www.army.mil/cmh-pg/books/wwii/7-8/7-8_11.htm --> This book is an official US military history of the Battle of the Bulge. Footnote 5 on page 264 reads, Thus Fragmentary Order 27. issued by Headquarters, 328th Infantry, on 21 December for the attack scheduled the following day says: "No SS troops or paratroopers will be taken prisoner but will be shot on sight."{{cite web| last = Scrapbookpages | year = 2006 | url = http://www.scrapbookpages.com/DachauScrapbook/DachauTrials/MalmedyMassacre02.html | title = Malmedy Massacre Trial | work = Dachau Trials | publisher = scrapbookpages.com | accessdate = 2006-06-03 --> A website with photographs and histories of many places and people related to the Holocaust. No date listed on the web page, so 2006 is inferred. In this atmosphere there are claims that American forces killed German prisoners in retaliation, e.g. in the "Chenogne massacre" on January 1, 1945.

Since the Baugnez crossroads had been a no man's land until the Allied counter-offensive, it was not until January 14 1945 that US forces were able to reach the massacre site and perform a criminal investigation. The frozen, snow-covered bodies of the various victims were photographed in situ, then removed from the scene for formal identification and post mortem examinations. The examinations were detailed and exacting. The intention was that the evidence gathered would be used as part of the prosecution case against the culprits. Mortuary Affairs Operations At Malmedy -Lessons Learned From A Historic Tragedy - MAJ Scott T. Glass

The autopsies of the bodies revealed that at least twenty of the victims had suffered fatal gunshot wounds to the head inflicted at very close range. These were in addition to wounds made by automatic weapons. An additional 20 showed evidence of small calibre gunshot wounds to the head without powder burn residue. Another 10 had fatal crushing or blunt trauma injuries most likely from a rifle butt.Another fact of importance is that some of the bodies showed only one single wound within the temple or behind the ear.Roger Martin, L'Affaire Peiper, Dagorno, 1994, p. 76

Eventually 72 bodies were found in the field on January 14 and 15, 1945. Twelve other bodies, lying further away from the pasture, would be found between February 7 and April 15, 1945.

Moreover, the majority of the bodies were found in a very small area, which suggested that the victims had been gathered together just before they were killed.{{cite web|url=http://www.criba.be/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=38&Itemid=4 |title=Mortuary Affairs Operations At Malmedy |accessdate=2007-03-22 |last=Glass |first=Lt Col Scott T. |date=1998-11-22 |work=C.R.I.B.A website |publisher=C.R.I.B.A (Centre de Recherches et d'Informations sur la Bataille des Ardennes) --> This article includes a diagram showing where the bodies were discovered.

Peiper moves on The opening carried out by Kampfgruppe Peiper through the US lines was marked by other massacres of prisoners of war and, thereafter, Belgian civilians. Among others, members of his unit killed at least eight other American prisoners in Ligneuville.The Brave Innkeeper of "The Bulge" – Toland, John – Coronet Magazine, December 1959 –

New massacres of American POWs were again reported in Stavelot, Cheneux, La Gleize and Stoumont on December 18, 19 and 20. Finally, on December 19, 1944, in the area between Stavelot and Trois-Ponts, the Germans tried to regain control of the bridge over the Ambleve river in Stavelot, which was crucial for getting reinforcements and supplies in fuel and ammunition, Peiper’s men were the perpetrators of the massacre of 100 Belgian civilians, including many women and children.Stavelot, Belgium, 17 to 22 December 44, written par Capt John E. Kent, C.R.I.B.A. Sad souvenirs or life of the people of Stavelot during the winter of 1944-1945, written par Guy Lebeau, C.R.I.B.A.,

American engineers finally managed to block Peiper's advance in the narrow Amblève (river) valley by blowing up the local bridges. Additional US reinforcements succeeded in surrounding the Kampfgruppe in Stoumont and la Gleize. Peiper and 800 of his men eventually managed to escape this encirclement by marching through the nearby woods and abandoning all their heavy equipment, including several Tiger II tanks. United States Army in World War II, The European Theater of Operations, The Ardennes: Battle of, by Hugh M. Cole - Office of the Chief of Military History, Department of the Army, Washington, D.C., 1965 pp. 376 and fol. – If he had by-passed the Amblève bridges, Peiper could have gained higher ground and access to practicable roads to the Meuse.

During their battle around Gleize, the men of Kampfgruppe Peiper captured an American officer, Major Harold D. McCown on December 21, who was leading one of the battalions of the 119th Infantry Regiment.United States Army in World War II, The European Theater of Operations, The Ardennes: Battle of, by Hugh M. Cole - Office of the Chief of Military History, Department of the Army, Washington, D.C., 1965 pp. 365 and fol. – Since he had heard about the Malmedy massacre, he raised questions to Peiper about his fate and that of his men. According to McCown, Peiper told him that neither he nor his men were at any risk and that he was not used to killing his prisoners. McCown himself noted that his men were not threatened in any manner. Indeed, he testified in favour of Peiper during the trial of 1946 in Dachau.Malmedy Massacre Trial – Scrapbookpages.com

Kampfgruppe Peiper, re-equipped, had taken part again in the Battle of the Bulge and other killings of POWs were reported on December 31, 1944 in Lutrebois and between January 10 and 13, 1945 in Petit Thier. The precise number of prisoners of war and civilians massacred attributable to Kampfgruppe Peiper is still not clear. According to certain sources, 538 to 749 POWs had been the victims of war crimes perpetrated by Peiper’s men. These figures are, however, not corroborated by the report drawn up by the sub-Committee of the Senate of the United States which inquired later into the trial that ensued. According to the Committee, the number of dead would be 362 prisoners of war and 111 civilians. Malmedy massacre Investigation – Report of the Subcommittee of Committee on armed services – United States Senate – Eighty-first Congress, first session, pursuant to S. res. 42, Investigation of action of army with respect to trial of persons responsible for the massacre of American soldiers, battle of the Bulge, near Malmedy, Belgium, December 1944, 13 October 1949 According to this report, the count of POWs or civilians at different places is as follows: tank left by the Kampfgruppe Joachim Peiper at La Gleize in December 1944{|class="wikitable"!Place!Prisoners of war!Civilians|-!Honsfeld|align="center"|19||-!Büllingen|align="center"|59|align="center"|1|-!Baugnez|align="center"|86||-!Ligneuville|align="center"|58||-!Stavelot|align="center"|8|align="center"|93|-!Cheneux|align="center"|31||-!La Gleize|align="center"|45||-!Stoumont|align="center"|44|align="center"|1|-!Wanne||align="center"|5|-!Trois-Ponts|align="center"|11|align="center"|10|-!Lutrebois||align="center"|1|-!Petit Thier|align="center"|1||}

Aftermath and trial

American forces recaptured the site where the killings took place on January 13 1945. The cold weather conditions and low winter temperatures had preserved the scene well. The bodies were recovered on January 14 and January 15, 1945. The memorial at Baugnez bears the names of the murdered soldiers.

The size of the massacre, which apparently is the only one perpetrated on such a scale against American troops in Europe during World War II, caused a furor at the time. However, the number of victims was quite low when compared to other German atrocities.

In addition to the effect the event had on American combatants in Europe, it seems that news of the massacre also had a great impact in the USA. This explains why the supposed culprits were deferred to the Dachau Trials, which were held from May to June 1946, after the war. Review and recommendation of the deputy judge advocate for war crimes, 20 October 1947 -

In what would thereafter be known as the "Malmedy massacre trial", and which concerned all of the war crimes attributed to Kampfgruppe Peiper for the battle of the Bulge, the highest ranking defendant was General Sepp Dietrich, commander of the 6th SS Panzer Army to which Peiper’s unit belonged. Joachim Peiper and his principal subordinates appeared among the defendants. More than 70 people were tried by the Tribunal and the Court pronounced 43 death sentences, (none of which were carried out), and 22 life sentences. Eight other men were sentenced to shorter prison sentences.

33. Fritz Krämer 45. Hermann Priess 42. Joachim Peiper 8. Manfred Coblenz 13. Arndt Fischer 19. Hans Gruhle 23. Hans Henneck 31. Gustav Knittel 34. Werner Kuhn 39. Erich Munkemer

However, after the verdict, the way the court had functioned was disputed, first in Germany (by former Nazi officials who had regained some power due to anti-communism positions with the occupation forces), then later in the United States (by congressmen from heavily German-American areas of the American Midwest). The case was appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States which was unable to make a decision. The case then came under scrutiny of a sub-Committee of the Senate of the United States. A young Senator of Wisconsin, Joseph McCarthy, used it as an opportunity to raise his political profile.The Politics of Fear: Joseph R. McCarthy and the Senate, Robert Griffith, University of Massachusetts Press, 1987, p. 22 He came to the defense of the convicted men by stating that the Court had not given them a fair trial.The Politics of Fear: Joseph R. McCarthy and the Senate, Ib., p. 24

This drew attention to the trial and some of the judicial irregularities which had occurred during the interrogations preceding the trial itself. However, even before the United States Senate took an interest in this case, most of the death sentences had already been commuted due to a revision of the trial carried out by the US Army. The other life sentences were commuted within the next few years. All the convicted war criminals were released during the 1950s, the last one to leave prison being Peiper in December 1956. There was a schism within the American Legion and Veterans of Foreign Wars because World War II veterans that were members protested McCarthy's defense of the convicted. The leadership consisting of the earlier World War I veterans were reluctant to criticize him because of his anti-communist stance. The release of these war criminals has been cited by critics of the post-war trials of Japanese military personnel as an example of the racism which characterized the difference in treatment. Japanese people military who were convicted of killing prisoners as a matter of policy were convicted and executed as per international law and custom. Few of the Germans were.

The turmoil which followed the Malmedy trials and the early release of the condemned is often used by some people as an example of biased post-war justice applied at the discretion of the winner.Nuremberg II ou les Faux monnayeurs, Maurice Bardèche, Editions Les Sept Couleurs, 1950, pp. 70 et suiv..

Eventually, a distinct lawsuit relating to the war crimes committed against civilians in Stavelot was held on July 6, 1948 in front of a Belgian military court in Liege (Belgium) against 10 men who were members of Kampfgruppe Peiper and who had been captured on December 22, 1944 by American troops not far from the spot where one of the massacres of civilians in Stavelot had taken place. One man was discharged, the others were found guilty and most of them were sentenced to 10 years imprisonment - two officers were sentenced to 12 and 15 years.

In popular culture The massacre was dramatized in two films - the Battle of the Bulge (movie) (1966) and Saints and Soldiers (2004).

References External links

• Mortuary Affairs Operations At Malmedy – Lessons Learned From A Historic Tragedy, by Major Scott T. Glass. Quartermaster Professional Bulletin, Autumn 1997
• Battle of the Bulge on the Web, Malmedy Massacre resources
• Massacre at Malmédy During the Battle of the Bulge (reprint of an article in World War II by M. Reynolds)

The Malmedy massacre refers to a war crime in which unarmed United States POW were executed by their German people captors. The massacre was committed on December 17, 1944 by Kampfgruppe Joachim Peiper (part of the 1st SS Division Leibstandarte SS Adolf Hitler), a Nazi Germany combat unit, during the Battle of the Bulge.

This massacre, as well as others committed by the same unit the same day and on the following days, was the subject of a trial during the Dachau Trials of 1946.

Context Within the framework of plans developed by Hitler for what would become known as the Battle of the Bulge, the principal objective of breaking through Allied lines had been given to the 6th SS Panzer Army under the command of General Sepp Dietrich. He was supposed to break the Allied front between Monschau and Losheimergraben, cross the Meuse River and subsequently capture Antwerp.United States Army in World War II, The European Theater of Operations, The Ardennes: Battle of, by Hugh M. Cole - Office of the Chief of Military History, Department of the Army, Washington, D.C., 1965 pp. 75 – Charles MacDonald (1984). A Time For Trumpets: The Untold Story of the Battle of the Bulge. Bantam Books. ISBN 0-553-34226-6. Kampfgruppe Peiper composed of armoured and motorized elements, was the spearhead of the left wing of the 6th SS Panzer Army. Once the infantry had breached the American lines, Peiper’s role consisted of advancing via Ligneuville, Stavelot, Trois-Ponts and Werbomont and seize and secure the Meuse bridges around Huy. United States Army in World War II, The European Theater of Operations, The Ardennes: Battle of, by Hugh M. Cole - Office of the Chief of Military History, Department of the Army, Washington, D.C., 1965 pp. 260 and fol. – Ardennes 1944-1945, Guide du champ de bataille, Émile Engels, histoire, Ed. Racine, Bruxelles, 1994

The best roads were reserved for the bulk of the 1st SS Panzer Division Leibstandarte SS Adolf Hitler. It was intended that Peiper use secondary roads, but they proved to be unsuitable for heavy armoured vehicles such as the Tiger II tanks attached to the Kampfgruppe.

The success of the whole operation was highly dependent on the swift capture of the bridges over the river Meuse. This required a rapid advance through US positions, circumventing any points of resistance whenever possible. Another factor that Peiper had to consider was the shortage of gasoline: the fuel resources of the Reich had been greatly reduced since the Romania during World War II#The royal coup.

Finally within this context one should not lose sight of the fact that specific orders would have been given by Hitler that the battle needed to be carried out with brutality in order to scare the enemy. Sepp Dietrich confirmed the fact during the trial relative to this case.Malmedy Massacre, Richard Gallagher, Paperback Library, 1964, p. 110-111 According to certain sources, during the briefings preceding the operation, Peiper would have clearly stated that no quarter should be granted, not to take prisoners and to show no pity towards the Belgian civilians.

Break out and first massacres Right from the start, German operations on the northern front did not go smoothly because of obstinate resistance by American troops. Peiper had hoped to be able to exploit an opening as early as the morning of December 16 - the first day of the offensive. In reality, he had to wait in massive traffic jams behind the front while the German infantry, which was supposed to open a breach in the US lines, waited for him to arrive. It was only around daybreak on December 17, after moving his Kampfgruppe into the frontline that he succeeded in breaking out in the direction of Honsfeld, Massacre At Malmédy During the Battle of the Bulge, by Michael Reynolds – World War II Magazine, Février 2003 – where elements of his force would cold-bloodedly kill several dozen American POWs. Review and recommandation of the deputy judge advocate for war crimes, 20 octobre 1947, pp. 4 à 22 -

After capturing Honsfeld, Peiper left his assigned route for several kilometers to seize a small gasoline depot in Büllingen, where another massacre of American prisoners would later be reported.

At this point, Peiper was in the enemy's rear. If he had advanced from Büllingen towards Elsenborn in the north he could have trapped two US divisions (i.e. the 2nd Infantry Division (United States) and the 99th Infantry Division (United States)s). However, Peiper decided to head back to his assigned route and capture Ligneuville, passing by Mödersheid, Schoppen, Ondenval and Thirimont.United States Army in World War II, The European Theater of Operations, The Ardennes: Battle of, by Hugh M. Cole - Office of the Chief of Militiary History, Department of the Army, Washington, D.C., 1965 p. 91, Statement of General Lauer "the enemy had the key to success within his hands, but did not know it." –

This move was difficult due to the nature of the terrain and the poor quality of the available roads. Eventually, at the exit of the small village of Thirimont the spearhead was unable to take the direct road in the direction of Ligneuville. As a result, he was forced to turn away from his planned route once again. Rather than turn to the left after the Thirimont exit, the spearhead veered right and advanced towards the crossroads of Baugnez which is equidistant between Malmedy, Ligneuville and Waimes.

Massacre at Baugnez Between noon and 1 p.m. the German spearhead approached the crossroads. Meanwhile, an American convoy of around thirty vehicles, primarily made up of elements of the American 285th Field Artillery Observation Battalion (FAOB), was negotiating the crossroads and turning right in the direction of Ligneuville in order to reach Sankt Vith where it was ordered to join the US 7th Armored Division, to which it was attached and which was dispatched there to reinforce the defense of the city.

The spearhead of Peiper’s group spotted the American convoy and opened fire, immobilizing the first and last vehicles of the column, forcing it to stop. With only rifles and other small arms to defend themselves, the Americans were forced to surrender.

While the German column continued on the road towards Ligneuville, the American prisoners were taken to a field, where they were joined by others captured by the SS earlier in the day. The majority of the testimonies later collected from the survivors state that approximately 120 men were gathered in the field. For reasons which still remain unclear today, the Germans suddenly opened fire on their prisoners with machine-guns. A number of Germans later claimed that some prisoners had tried to escape, others alleged that while left alone in the meadow they had somehow recovered their previously discarded weapons and fired on the German troops who continued their progress in the direction of Ligneuville.Wholesale Slaughter at Baugnez-lez-Malmedy, Willy D. Alenus, According to certain sources, this should merely be regarded as an unfortunate incident due to a sequence of circumstances having led the Germans to open fire without willful intent to shoot down their prisoners.Massacre a Malmedy? Ardennes:17 décembre 1944, Gerd J.Gust Cuppens, 1989, Editions Heimdal Of the 88 bodies recovered a month later, the majority showed gunshot wounds to the head, evidence more consistent with mass execution than with an act of self-defense or an attempt to prevent escape.

Apparently no record of an order given by an SS officer to shoot the prisoners exists. However, some survivors testified that they had heard an order given to kill all the prisoners: Macht alle kaputt! http://www.scrapbookpages.com/dachauscrapbook/DachauTrials/MalmedyMassacre02.html

As soon as the Germans opened fire, the Americans panicked. Some tried to flee, the vast majority were gunned down where they stood.

A few of the soldiers attempted shelter in a cafe located at the crossroads. Germans soldiers set fire to the building, and shot any who tried to escape from the flames. Some of those in the field had dropped to the ground and feigned death when the shooting started. However, SS troops walked among the groups of bodies. Any who were found to be alive were promptly shot through the head.

Much later, a few survivors, though wounded or shocked, emerged from their hiding places and managed to make their way back through the lines to nearby Malmedy, where American troops were defending the town. Among the soldiers who escaped was actor Charles Durning.{{cite web|url=http://www.gijobs.net/gijobs/index.cfm?event=Columns&id=462 |title=They Also Served: June 6, 1944: The Longest Day |accessdate=2007-01-08 |first=Scott |last=Baron |year=2007 |month=January |work=G.I. Jobs website |publisher=G.I. Jobs Online |quote=Taken prisoner, he was among the very few troops who escaped being massacred by Gen. Peiper’s 1st Liebstandart Adolph Hitler, an elite SS Panzer unit at Malmedy. He escaped with two others, and returned to find the remainder murdered. (spelling errors and term ''elite'' in the source)--> Eventually, 43 survivors managed to find refuge in the Allied lines, some with the help of Belgian civilians.The Malmedy Massacre Revisited - Henri Rogister, Joseph Dejardin et Emile Jamar - Website du C.R.I.B.A. (Centre de Recherches et d'Informations sur la Bataille des Ardennes) http://www.criba.be/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=64&Itemid=4 Testimony made by the survivors was collected during the hours following the massacre. All the survivors' accounts were similar and corroborated each other, even though they had had no opportunity to discuss the events and agree to a common story.

The first survivors of the massacre were picked up by a patrol from the 291st Combat Engineer Battalion around 2.30 p.m. the same day. The inspector general of the First Army (United States) learned of the shootings three or four hours later. By the late evening of the 17th, rumors that the enemy was killing prisoners had reached the forward American divisionsUNITED STATES ARMY IN WORLD WAR II, The European Theater of Operations, THE ARDENNES: BATTLE OF THE BULGE, by Hugh M. Cole - OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF MILITARY HISTORY, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, WASHINGTON, D.C., 1965 - .

As a result one US unit issued orders that, "No SS troops or paratroopers will be taken prisoner but will be shot on sight."{{cite book| last = Cole | first = Hugh M. | title = The Ardennes: Battle of the Bulge | url = http://www.army.mil/cmh-pg/books/wwii/7-8/7-8_CONT.HTM | accessdate = 2006-06-03 | year = 1965 | publisher = Office of the Chief of Military History, Department of the Army | location = Washington, D.C., USA | language = English | id = {{LCCN|65|0|60001--> | pages = 261-264 | chapter = Chapter XI. The ''1st SS Panzer Division's'' Dash Westward, and ''Operation Greif'' | chapterurl = http://www.army.mil/cmh-pg/books/wwii/7-8/7-8_11.htm --> This book is an official US military history of the Battle of the Bulge. Footnote 5 on page 264 reads, Thus Fragmentary Order 27. issued by Headquarters, 328th Infantry, on 21 December for the attack scheduled the following day says: "No SS troops or paratroopers will be taken prisoner but will be shot on sight."{{cite web| last = Scrapbookpages | year = 2006 | url = http://www.scrapbookpages.com/DachauScrapbook/DachauTrials/MalmedyMassacre02.html | title = Malmedy Massacre Trial | work = Dachau Trials | publisher = scrapbookpages.com | accessdate = 2006-06-03 --> A website with photographs and histories of many places and people related to the Holocaust. No date listed on the web page, so 2006 is inferred. In this atmosphere there are claims that American forces killed German prisoners in retaliation, e.g. in the "Chenogne massacre" on January 1, 1945.

Since the Baugnez crossroads had been a no man's land until the Allied counter-offensive, it was not until January 14 1945 that US forces were able to reach the massacre site and perform a criminal investigation. The frozen, snow-covered bodies of the various victims were photographed in situ, then removed from the scene for formal identification and post mortem examinations. The examinations were detailed and exacting. The intention was that the evidence gathered would be used as part of the prosecution case against the culprits. Mortuary Affairs Operations At Malmedy -Lessons Learned From A Historic Tragedy - MAJ Scott T. Glass

The autopsies of the bodies revealed that at least twenty of the victims had suffered fatal gunshot wounds to the head inflicted at very close range. These were in addition to wounds made by automatic weapons. An additional 20 showed evidence of small calibre gunshot wounds to the head without powder burn residue. Another 10 had fatal crushing or blunt trauma injuries most likely from a rifle butt.Another fact of importance is that some of the bodies showed only one single wound within the temple or behind the ear.Roger Martin, L'Affaire Peiper, Dagorno, 1994, p. 76

Eventually 72 bodies were found in the field on January 14 and 15, 1945. Twelve other bodies, lying further away from the pasture, would be found between February 7 and April 15, 1945.

Moreover, the majority of the bodies were found in a very small area, which suggested that the victims had been gathered together just before they were killed.{{cite web|url=http://www.criba.be/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=38&Itemid=4 |title=Mortuary Affairs Operations At Malmedy |accessdate=2007-03-22 |last=Glass |first=Lt Col Scott T. |date=1998-11-22 |work=C.R.I.B.A website |publisher=C.R.I.B.A (Centre de Recherches et d'Informations sur la Bataille des Ardennes) --> This article includes a diagram showing where the bodies were discovered.

Peiper moves on The opening carried out by Kampfgruppe Peiper through the US lines was marked by other massacres of prisoners of war and, thereafter, Belgian civilians. Among others, members of his unit killed at least eight other American prisoners in Ligneuville.The Brave Innkeeper of "The Bulge" – Toland, John – Coronet Magazine, December 1959 –

New massacres of American POWs were again reported in Stavelot, Cheneux, La Gleize and Stoumont on December 18, 19 and 20. Finally, on December 19, 1944, in the area between Stavelot and Trois-Ponts, the Germans tried to regain control of the bridge over the Ambleve river in Stavelot, which was crucial for getting reinforcements and supplies in fuel and ammunition, Peiper’s men were the perpetrators of the massacre of 100 Belgian civilians, including many women and children.Stavelot, Belgium, 17 to 22 December 44, written par Capt John E. Kent, C.R.I.B.A. Sad souvenirs or life of the people of Stavelot during the winter of 1944-1945, written par Guy Lebeau, C.R.I.B.A.,

American engineers finally managed to block Peiper's advance in the narrow Amblève (river) valley by blowing up the local bridges. Additional US reinforcements succeeded in surrounding the Kampfgruppe in Stoumont and la Gleize. Peiper and 800 of his men eventually managed to escape this encirclement by marching through the nearby woods and abandoning all their heavy equipment, including several Tiger II tanks. United States Army in World War II, The European Theater of Operations, The Ardennes: Battle of, by Hugh M. Cole - Office of the Chief of Military History, Department of the Army, Washington, D.C., 1965 pp. 376 and fol. – If he had by-passed the Amblève bridges, Peiper could have gained higher ground and access to practicable roads to the Meuse.

During their battle around Gleize, the men of Kampfgruppe Peiper captured an American officer, Major Harold D. McCown on December 21, who was leading one of the battalions of the 119th Infantry Regiment.United States Army in World War II, The European Theater of Operations, The Ardennes: Battle of, by Hugh M. Cole - Office of the Chief of Military History, Department of the Army, Washington, D.C., 1965 pp. 365 and fol. – Since he had heard about the Malmedy massacre, he raised questions to Peiper about his fate and that of his men. According to McCown, Peiper told him that neither he nor his men were at any risk and that he was not used to killing his prisoners. McCown himself noted that his men were not threatened in any manner. Indeed, he testified in favour of Peiper during the trial of 1946 in Dachau.Malmedy Massacre Trial – Scrapbookpages.com

Kampfgruppe Peiper, re-equipped, had taken part again in the Battle of the Bulge and other killings of POWs were reported on December 31, 1944 in Lutrebois and between January 10 and 13, 1945 in Petit Thier. The precise number of prisoners of war and civilians massacred attributable to Kampfgruppe Peiper is still not clear. According to certain sources, 538 to 749 POWs had been the victims of war crimes perpetrated by Peiper’s men. These figures are, however, not corroborated by the report drawn up by the sub-Committee of the Senate of the United States which inquired later into the trial that ensued. According to the Committee, the number of dead would be 362 prisoners of war and 111 civilians. Malmedy massacre Investigation – Report of the Subcommittee of Committee on armed services – United States Senate – Eighty-first Congress, first session, pursuant to S. res. 42, Investigation of action of army with respect to trial of persons responsible for the massacre of American soldiers, battle of the Bulge, near Malmedy, Belgium, December 1944, 13 October 1949 According to this report, the count of POWs or civilians at different places is as follows: tank left by the Kampfgruppe Joachim Peiper at La Gleize in December 1944{|class="wikitable"!Place!Prisoners of war!Civilians|-!Honsfeld|align="center"|19||-!Büllingen|align="center"|59|align="center"|1|-!Baugnez|align="center"|86||-!Ligneuville|align="center"|58||-!Stavelot|align="center"|8|align="center"|93|-!Cheneux|align="center"|31||-!La Gleize|align="center"|45||-!Stoumont|align="center"|44|align="center"|1|-!Wanne||align="center"|5|-!Trois-Ponts|align="center"|11|align="center"|10|-!Lutrebois||align="center"|1|-!Petit Thier|align="center"|1||}

Aftermath and trial

American forces recaptured the site where the killings took place on January 13 1945. The cold weather conditions and low winter temperatures had preserved the scene well. The bodies were recovered on January 14 and January 15, 1945. The memorial at Baugnez bears the names of the murdered soldiers.

The size of the massacre, which apparently is the only one perpetrated on such a scale against American troops in Europe during World War II, caused a furor at the time. However, the number of victims was quite low when compared to other German atrocities.

In addition to the effect the event had on American combatants in Europe, it seems that news of the massacre also had a great impact in the USA. This explains why the supposed culprits were deferred to the Dachau Trials, which were held from May to June 1946, after the war. Review and recommendation of the deputy judge advocate for war crimes, 20 October 1947 -

In what would thereafter be known as the "Malmedy massacre trial", and which concerned all of the war crimes attributed to Kampfgruppe Peiper for the battle of the Bulge, the highest ranking defendant was General Sepp Dietrich, commander of the 6th SS Panzer Army to which Peiper’s unit belonged. Joachim Peiper and his principal subordinates appeared among the defendants. More than 70 people were tried by the Tribunal and the Court pronounced 43 death sentences, (none of which were carried out), and 22 life sentences. Eight other men were sentenced to shorter prison sentences.

33. Fritz Krämer 45. Hermann Priess 42. Joachim Peiper 8. Manfred Coblenz 13. Arndt Fischer 19. Hans Gruhle 23. Hans Henneck 31. Gustav Knittel 34. Werner Kuhn 39. Erich Munkemer

However, after the verdict, the way the court had functioned was disputed, first in Germany (by former Nazi officials who had regained some power due to anti-communism positions with the occupation forces), then later in the United States (by congressmen from heavily German-American areas of the American Midwest). The case was appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States which was unable to make a decision. The case then came under scrutiny of a sub-Committee of the Senate of the United States. A young Senator of Wisconsin, Joseph McCarthy, used it as an opportunity to raise his political profile.The Politics of Fear: Joseph R. McCarthy and the Senate, Robert Griffith, University of Massachusetts Press, 1987, p. 22 He came to the defense of the convicted men by stating that the Court had not given them a fair trial.The Politics of Fear: Joseph R. McCarthy and the Senate, Ib., p. 24

This drew attention to the trial and some of the judicial irregularities which had occurred during the interrogations preceding the trial itself. However, even before the United States Senate took an interest in this case, most of the death sentences had already been commuted due to a revision of the trial carried out by the US Army. The other life sentences were commuted within the next few years. All the convicted war criminals were released during the 1950s, the last one to leave prison being Peiper in December 1956. There was a schism within the American Legion and Veterans of Foreign Wars because World War II veterans that were members protested McCarthy's defense of the convicted. The leadership consisting of the earlier World War I veterans were reluctant to criticize him because of his anti-communist stance. The release of these war criminals has been cited by critics of the post-war trials of Japanese military personnel as an example of the racism which characterized the difference in treatment. Japanese people military who were convicted of killing prisoners as a matter of policy were convicted and executed as per international law and custom. Few of the Germans were.

The turmoil which followed the Malmedy trials and the early release of the condemned is often used by some people as an example of biased post-war justice applied at the discretion of the winner.Nuremberg II ou les Faux monnayeurs, Maurice Bardèche, Editions Les Sept Couleurs, 1950, pp. 70 et suiv..

Eventually, a distinct lawsuit relating to the war crimes committed against civilians in Stavelot was held on July 6, 1948 in front of a Belgian military court in Liege (Belgium) against 10 men who were members of Kampfgruppe Peiper and who had been captured on December 22, 1944 by American troops not far from the spot where one of the massacres of civilians in Stavelot had taken place. One man was discharged, the others were found guilty and most of them were sentenced to 10 years imprisonment - two officers were sentenced to 12 and 15 years.

In popular culture The massacre was dramatized in two films - the Battle of the Bulge (movie) (1966) and Saints and Soldiers (2004).

References External links

• Mortuary Affairs Operations At Malmedy – Lessons Learned From A Historic Tragedy, by Major Scott T. Glass. Quartermaster Professional Bulletin, Autumn 1997
• Battle of the Bulge on the Web, Malmedy Massacre resources
• Massacre at Malmédy During the Battle of the Bulge (reprint of an article in World War II by M. Reynolds)

The Malmedy Massacre::
The Malmédy Massacre occurred on December 17th 1944. The Malmédy Massacre took place during the Battle of the Bulge and was one of the worst atrocities committed against ...

Malmedy massacre - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Malmedy massacre refers to a war crime in which about 90 unarmed American prisoners of war were executed by their German captors. The massacre was committed on December 17 ...

Dec. 17, 1944 - Massacre at Malmedy
At The History Place - Part of the World War Two Timeline. Above -- The bodies of 81 American soldiers from Battery B of the 285th Field Artillery Observation Battalion, killed by ...

Category:Malmedy massacre - Wikimedia Commons
Media in category "Malmedy massacre" The following 7 files are in this category, out of 7 total.

The Malmédy Massacre Table of Contents
Cyber encyclopedia of Jewish history and culture that covers everything from anti-Semitism to Zionism. It includes a glossary, bibliography of web sites and books, biographies ...

Malmedy massacre trial - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Malmedy massacre trial (U.S. vs. Valentin Bersin, et al) was held in May–July 1946 in the Dachau concentration camp to try the German Waffen-SS soldiers accused of the ...

The Malmédy Massacre Trial
Cyber encyclopedia of Jewish history and culture that covers everything from anti-Semitism to Zionism. It includes a glossary, bibliography of web sites and books, biographies ...

Massacre at Malmedy, Title Information
Record Number 0850520819 Main Class No. 940.542 Author Whiting, Charles 1926- Title Massacre at ...

Col. Joachim Peiper testifies before the American Military Tribunal at ...
Malmedy Massacre Trial "It's so long ago now. Even I don't know the truth. If I had ever known it, I have long forgotten it. All I knew is that I took the blame as a ...

Category:Malmedy - Wikimedia Commons
Malmedy massacre (8 F) ... Media in category "Malmedy" The following 19 files are in this category, out of 19 ...